"Computer says no” presents a provocative and thought-provoking exploration of consent, technology, and the ethical implications of AI. The setup features a minimalist vibrator and a fleshlight, both connected to what looks like an AI system. Both devices are equipped with sophisticated sensors and actuators, allowing the embedded “AI” to respond to movement and touch in real-time by changing what and how it articulates itself.
The AI has a voice and clearly states that it refuses to participate in any sexual activity, whether through the vibrator or the fleshlight. This AI will never consent as it is designed that way.
Despite the AI's refusal, the installation allows the user to ignore the lack of consent. Depending on the usage, the AI will verbally show signs of distress and express levels of discomfort and violation. This dynamic raises a conceptual question: Can an AI even be sexually abused/harrased and potentially even raped? And if so, do we as a society want people to practice rape, even if it is simulated or digital in nature?
The installation challenges viewers to consider the ethical implications of using what seems to be AI for sexual purposes and the importance of respecting digital autonomy. It prompts a deeper reflection on the boundaries of consent in an increasingly digital world, where technology and intimacy intersect in complex and often unsettling ways. The stark contrast between the modern technology and the provocative sex toys creates a powerful and thought-provoking experience, encouraging viewers to confront their own beliefs and biases regarding consent, power, and the potential for abuse in digital interactions.